Criteria
|
Unsatisfactory – 0%
|
Limited – 80%
|
Proficient – 90%
|
Exemplary – 100%
|
Rating
|
Content
and Creativity
Weight for this criterion: 40% of total score |
Postings show no evidence of insight, understanding
or reflective thought about the topic.
|
Postings provide minimal insight, understanding and
reflective thought about the topic.
|
Postings provide moderate insight, understanding and
reflective thought about the topic.
|
Postings provide comprehensive insight,
understanding, and reflective thought about the topic by
...building a focused argument around a specific issue or ...asking a new related question or ...making an oppositional statement supported by personal experience or related research. |
|
Postings present no specific viewpoint and no
supporting examples or links to websites or documents are provided, or the
links selected are of poor quality and do not add any value to the
information presented.
|
Postings present a specific viewpoint but lack
supporting examples or links to websites or documents, but not all links
enhance the information presented.
|
Postings present a specific viewpoint that is
substantiated by supporting examples and links to websites or documents, but
not all links enhance the information presented.
|
Postings present a focused and cohesive viewpoint
that is substantiated by effective supporting examples or links to
relevant, up-to-date websites or documents that enhance the information
presented.
|
||
Postings are do not stimulate dialogue and
commentary and do not connect with the audience.
|
Postings are brief and unimaginative, and reflect
minimal effort to connect with the audience.
|
Postings are generally well written with some
attempts made to stimulate dialogue and commentary.
|
Postings are creatively and fluently written to
stimulate dialogue and commentary.
|
||
Voice
Weight for this criterion: 20% of total score |
Postings do not reflect an awareness of the audience
and it is difficult to identify the author’s voice.
|
Postings are written in a style that does not fully
consider the audience, and the author’s voice is difficult to identify.
|
Postings are written in a style that is generally
appropriate for the intended audience and an attempt is made to use a
consistent voice.
|
Postings are written in a style that is appealing
and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident
throughout.
|
|
Postings do not reflect the author’s personality and
word choice does not bring the topic to life.
|
Postings reflect almost no personality and little
attempt is made to use effective word choices to bring the topic to life.
|
Postings reflect a bit of the author’s personality
through word choices that attempt to bring the topic to life.
|
Postings reflect the author’s unique personality
through expressive and carefully selected word choices that bring the topic
to life.
|
||
Text
Layout, Use of Graphics and Multimedia
Weight for this criterion: 20% of total score |
Does not insert any graphics, or uses only
low-quality graphics and multimedia, which do not enhance the content.
|
Selects and inserts many low-quality graphics and
multimedia which do not enhance the content.
|
Selects and inserts graphics and multimedia that are
mostly high quality and enhance and clarify the content.
|
Selects and inserts high quality graphics and
multimedia when appropriate to enhance the content’s visual appeal and
increase readability.
|
|
Does not acknowledge any image or multimedia
sources, either with a caption or an annotation.
|
Acknowledges only a few multimedia and image sources
and uses incomplete captions or annotations.
|
Acknowledges most image and multimedia sources with
captions or annotations.
|
Acknowledges all image and multimedia sources with
captions or annotations.
|
||
Timeliness
and Tags
Weight for this criterion: 10% of total score |
Does not update blog within the required time frame.
|
Updates blog when reminded; posts are often missing
a date stamp.
|
Updates blog when required; most posts are
date-stamped with the most current posting listed at the top.
|
Updates blog as often or more often than required;
all posts are date-stamped and the most recent posts are placed at the top of
the page.
|
|
Does not categorize and tag the topic appropriately.
|
The post is not categorized and tagged
appropriately.
|
Post is categorized and tagged.
|
Post is categorized and topics are tagged
appropriately.
|
||
Citations
Weight for this criterion: 5% of total score |
No images, media or text created by others display
appropriate copyright permissions and do not include accurate, properly
formatted citations.
|
Some of the images, media or text created by others
does not display appropriate copyright permissions and does not include
accurate, properly formatted citations.
|
Most images, media or text created by others display
appropriate copyright permissions and accurate, properly formatted citations.
|
All images, media and text created by others display
appropriate copyright permissions and accurate citations.
|
|
Quality
of Writing and Proofreading
Weight for this criterion: 5% of total score |
Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate
effective communication.
|
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
|
Written responses are largely free of grammatical,
spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally
facilitates communication.
|
Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
|
|
TOTAL
|
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Filled Under:
assisment
A Rubric for Evaluating Student for outhentic assisment
Posted By:
Unknown
on 2:41 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment